The arXiv is smarter than I thought…

So, I accidentally submitted the aforementioned paper to the “General Topology” section of the arXiv rather than the “Geometric Topology” (I’m sure I’m not the first who’s made that mistake) and they fixed it! I got an email this morning saying that they had reclassified it.  I’ve gotta say, I was impressed.  Now we just have to work getting the arXiv to be a little more Web 2.0 (they really need to have a comments section).

3 thoughts on “The arXiv is smarter than I thought…

  1. Hold on, I’m getting there!
    Well, sort of. I’ve been thinking about the arxiv for a while, and started doing some programming, but there’s nothing really ready to show for it yet. Something you might like to have a look at is http://arxivwiki.org/. It’s not being developed at the moment, as I’ve decided to start over and do things a little better the second time through. If anyone feels like having a look, and commenting on what I was trying to achieve there, I’d love to hear.
    Coming up soon from my arxiv explorations might be
    *a bittorrent mirror of the math arxiv, similar to the one that already exists (http://www.theory.physics.ubc.ca/arxiv/) for hep-th and gr-qc.
    *a web interface to all the metadata I’ve been extracting; things like coauthorship, references, etc. I’m turning everything into RDF (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework),
    which hopefully means that various really cool tools (inference engines, graphical browsers) should just work. But we’ll see! :-)

  2. I get the impression that they want a comment system, but haven’t figured out an appropriately hands-off moderation system yet.

  3. Given the brouhaha that occurred with trackbacks on the physics arXiv:
    Peter Woit, Background Concerning the Weblog “Not Even Wrong” and Trackbacks to the ArXiv.
    Jacques Distler, ArXiv trackback policy.
    I think the best thing is to not have officially sanctioned arXiv trackbacks — they’ll inevitably lead to power struggles. Instead, the arXiv should make it easy (if it’s not already) for anyone to set up their own arXiv trackback or discussion site. You could go to any such site and read comments or discussion about arXiv papers. Some sites might have repressive policies that only allow carefully chosen blogs to do trackbacks, or only allow established bigshots to post comments. Other sites could be free-for-alls where anyone, even raving crackpots, could join in.
    Natural selection will do the rest.
    There would probably wind up being one or two sites that most mathematicians go to.

Comments are closed.